Table 1.
year | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | time lag | mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1995–1996 | −0.36 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.31 | −0.26 | 0.25 | with 95/96a | 0.06 |
2005 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.25 | −0.28 | −0.49 | −0.08 | 1 year | 0.23 |
2006 | 1 | 0.68 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 2 year | 0.21 | |
2007 | 1 | 0.23 | −0.02 | 0.09 | 3 year | −0.04 | ||
2008 | 1 | −0.07 | 0.46 | 4 year | −0.20 | |||
2009 | 1 | 0.09 | 5 year | −0.08b | ||||
2010 | 1 |
aNot the same time lag between each year and the 1995–1996 pooled dataset.
bWith only one value for a 5-year lag, this value is not a mean but simply the correlation coefficient for the matrices of 2005 and 2010.