Table 1.
Comparison of assembly and 3D tissue engineering technologies.
| Performance metric | Microfluidic Assembly[115–117] | Ratchet assembly[71] | Acoustic Assembly[42] | Magnetic Assembly[43] | Surface tension driven assembly[205] | Scaffold based engineering[25–27,40] | Laser Bioprinting[64,91] | InkJet Bioprinting[88–90] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput | Low | High | High | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
| Microgel Size | 50 μm and smaller | 50–1000 μm | 50–1000 μm | 50–1000 μm | 200–1000 μm | N/A | N/A | 100–1000 μm |
| Complexity | High | Low | Low | Medium | Low | Low | High | High |
| Adverse Effects on Cells | Low | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Spatial Resolution | High | Medium | Medium | High | Low | Low | High | High |
| Cell density | High | High | High | High | High | High | Medium | Medium |