Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2012 Mar;1(2):149–158. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201200011

Table 1.

Comparison of assembly and 3D tissue engineering technologies.

Performance metric Microfluidic Assembly[115117] Ratchet assembly[71] Acoustic Assembly[42] Magnetic Assembly[43] Surface tension driven assembly[205] Scaffold based engineering[2527,40] Laser Bioprinting[64,91] InkJet Bioprinting[8890]
Throughput Low High High High Medium Medium Medium High
Microgel Size 50 μm and smaller 50–1000 μm 50–1000 μm 50–1000 μm 200–1000 μm N/A N/A 100–1000 μm
Complexity High Low Low Medium Low Low High High
Adverse Effects on Cells Low Low Low Low Medium Low Medium Medium
Spatial Resolution High Medium Medium High Low Low High High
Cell density High High High High High High Medium Medium