Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2013 Feb 16;123(7):1746–1753. doi: 10.1002/lary.23987

Table 2.

Optimal classification accuracies for each analysis. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation and represent classification accuracy over twenty iterations at the specified number of hidden nodes. UES = upper esophageal sphincter.

Parameters Hidden nodes Normal (%) Disordered (%) Total (%)
3-dimensional 640 90.62±2.71 82.79±3.29 86.71±1.47
2-dimensional 580 87.57±1.57 79.15±2.41 83.36±1.42
3-dimensional + other 620 97.43±0.59 96.54±0.91 96.99±0.51
2-dimensional + other 640 96.27±2.03 96.37±0.66 96.32±1.05
3-D velopharynx 600 64.90±8.00 66.43±6.43 65.66±2.48
2-D velopharynx 660 70.69±9.59 60.99±5.82 65.84±3.46
3-D hypopharynx 540 71.41±5.18 62.33±4.27 66.87±1.74
2-D hypopharynx 620 68.87±7.44 64.43±6.77 66.65±2.36
3-D pre-opening peak 600 64.00±6.47 68.94±6.68 66.47±1.63
2-D pre-UES peak 580 64.65±6.50 63.29±6.80 63.97±2.30
3-D post-closure peak 660 73.50±7.56 62.29±6.91 67.90±8.67
2-D post-closure peak 660 65.83±6.77 65.05±6.49 65.44±2.02
3-D UES 580 64.72±3.78 65.40±3.70 65.06±2.03
2-D UES 620 62.98±5.62 65.99±5.05 64.49±2.70