Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 7;107(11):3200–3216. doi: 10.1152/jn.00943.2011

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Developmental profiles of input resistance in medial and lateral slices. A: input resistance varied with age in both slices [medial: F(2, 56) = 4.23, P = 0.019; lateral: F(2, 37) = 4.88, P = 0.013; 1-way ANOVA]. Specifically, input resistance decreased from P6–7 to P12–13 (P = 0.022) in the medial slice and from P3–4 to P12–13 in the lateral slice (P = 0.011; Tukey's post hoc test; P > 0.05 in other comparisons). Input resistance did not differ significantly between the 2 slices at any age (P3–4: P = 0.14, P6–7: P = 0.58, P12–13: P = 0.46; 2-tailed Student's t-test with false discovery rate procedure for multiple comparisons). *P < 0.05. B: ipsilateral monocular enucleation at P0 had no statistically significant effect on input resistance at P6–7 (effect of slice: P = 0.96, effect of enucleation: P = 0.97, interaction: P = 0.93; 2-way ANOVA with factors encoding for slice and enucleation treatment).