Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 5;44(15):741–753. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00187.2011

Table 2.

qPCR results validate the microarray results in 13 out of 16 comparisons

SD vs. PCK qPCR
SD vs. PCK microarray
Probe target Gene Name SD PCK Significance Fold Change significance
1368224_AT Serpina3 1 ± 0.24 74.47 ± 18.61 P < 0.05 27.44 P < 0.05
1371970_AT Fam111A 1 ± 0.22 40.62 ± 4.89 P < 0.05 32.08 P < 0.05
1391262_AT LOC690251 1 ± 0.13 11.86 ± 3.48 P < 0.05 −7.70 P < 0.05
1369663_AT Ephx2 1 ± 0.17 2.58 ± 0.66 P < 0.05 −6.05 P < 0.05
1391864_AT Enpp6 1 ± 0.17 0.24 ± 0.06 P < 0.05 −6.65 P < 0.05
1397688_AT Pcdh9 1 ± 0.47 0.28 ± 0.03 P < 0.05 −2.06 P < 0.05
1379420_AT RGD1565002 1 ± 0.14 1.14 ± 0.15 NS 1.01 NS
1383783_AT Pcdh9 1 ± 0.32 0.43 ± 0.09 P < 0.05 −5.96 P < 0.05
FHH vs. FHH.Pkhd1 qPCR
FHH vs. FHH.Pkhd1 microarray
FHH FHH.Pkhd1 Significance Fold Change significance
1368224_AT Serpina3 1 ± 0.14 0.98 ± 0.27 NS −1.14 NS
1371970_AT Fam111A 1 ± 0.15 1.84 ± 0.15 P < 0.05 1.12 P < 0.05
1391262_AT LOC690251 1 ± 0.22 0.48 ± 0.11 NS −1.14 NS
1369663_AT Ephx2 1 ± 0.10 1.49 ± 0.22 NS 1.03 NS
1391864_AT Enpp6 1 ± 0.09 0.95 ± 0.12 NS 1.01 NS
1397688_AT Pcdh9 1 ± 0.24 0.33 ± 0.07 P < 0.05 −2.32 P < 0.05
1379420_AT RGD1565002 1 ± 0.08 1.80 ± 0.40 P < 0.05 1.04 NS
1383783_AT Pcdh9 1 ± 0.17 0.52 ± 0.13 P < 0.05 −3.39 P < 0.05

PCR primers were designed over 9 different Affymetrix probes (probe target) that correspond to 8 different genes (Gene Name). delta Ct values (probe of interest Ct - GAPDH Ct) between SD, PCK, FHH, and FHH.Pkhd1 were compared by 1-way ANOVA to determine significance status (either significant [P < 0.05] or not significant [NS]). Data are presented as PCK fold change vs. SD and FHH.Pkhd1 fold change vs. FHH. Microarray fold changes and significance for each respective Affymetrix probe is listed to the right of the qPCR result. Microarray fold changes in boldface indicate that the result (fold change direction and significance status) was reproduced by qPCR.