Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;15(1):15–24.

Table 2.

††: Major Studies‡‡ of Unstructured HIV Treatment Interruption

Study Location(s), Year(s) §§ Total (Interruption) No. of Patients Interruption Criteria Follow- Up (Years) Major Results
EuroSIDA[69] Europe, Argentina, Israel 1997–2005 3811 (879) Interruption of ≥3 months 5.5 Incidence of AIDS or Death was 1.14 times more likely in patients who experienced interruption (p=0.37)
I.Co.N.A.[70] Italy 1997–2004 3142 (721) Interruption of ≥12 weeks 0.8 Patients who experienced interruption had a 2.75 times higher hazard of HIV clinical progression (p=0.03)
Swiss HIV Cohort[71] Switzerland 1996–2008 2491 (1271) Interruption of ≥1 month (2 control groups: Intermittent or constant VL ≥1000) 8 Median CD4=427 in interruption group; 525 or 645 in controls; 63% CD4>350 in interruption group; 76% or 87% in controls, (p<0.001)
Knobel et al.[72] Barcelona, Spain 1996–2007 540 (231) Interruption of ≥3 days 8.3 Patients who experienced interruption had a 1.39 times higher hazard of treatment failure (CI 1.04–1.85)
Wolf et al.[73] Germany *** 339 (133) Interruption of ≥2 weeks 2 CD4 no change from baseline in interruption group; significant increase in controls (<0.001)
Ncaca et al. (43) Cape Town, South Africa 2002–2007 244 (21) Interruption of ≥27 days 4.4 Odds of failure increase 5.65 times (CI 1.4–22.85)
††

Table is sorted by descending number of patients within each category. Abbreviations: No.-number, VL- viral load, IRR- incidence rate ratio, CI- 95% confidence interval.

‡‡

Studies included (i) had a control group with no treatment interruption; (ii) had >40 adult participants; (iii) were not limited to patients with multi-drug resistance; and (iv) were completed after 2000.

§§

Year(s) listed are dates of conduction of the study.

***

Dates not available.