Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e73478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073478

Table 1. Summary of enrichment factor estimation from various docking scenarios.

Enrichment run Models Dataset Number of compounds Docking Scenarios Enrichment factor ROC
Active Inactive 1% 2% 5%
Pubchem Actives 1 Original 20 971 HTS 20 11 8.5 0.82
2 SP 29 15 8.9 0.91
3 XP 24 15 8.0 0.72
4 Epik 36 1526 HTS 21 12 6.0 0.90
5 SP 20 12 6.0 0.90
6 XP 15 9.9 4.0 0.77
Literature Active 7 Original 30 971 HTS 29 24 9.9 0.81
8 SP 32 27 11.0 0.83
9 XP 29 17 9.2 0.68
10 Epik 59 1526 HTS 31 17 8.7 0.88
11 SP 30 21 10.0 0.89
12 XP 10 13 8.6 0.83
Combined Active datasets 13 Original 50 971 HTS 20 19 8.7 0.81
14 SP 20 20 10.0 0.87
15 XP 20 14 8.7 0.70
16 Epik 95 1526 HTS 20 14 7.6 0.89
17 SP 20 16 8.0 0.90
18 XP 12 10 6.8 0.81

Note: ROC = Receiver Operator Characterics, XP: Extra precision, SP: Standard precision, HTS: High throughput screening.