Skip to main content
. 2013 May 18;4(3):209–216. doi: 10.1007/s13539-013-0108-8

Table 2.

Frequency (percentage) of hip fracture patients (n = 71) presenting above or below each diagnostic parameter for geriatric cachexia

Diagnostic parameters Above diagnostic criteria (n, %) Below diagnostic criteria (n, %)
BMI ≤22 kg m2 61 (85.9 %) 10 (14.1 %)
ASM index (kg m2): ≤7.25 men; ≤5.45 womena 49 (69 %) 22 (31 %)
Isometric grip-strength: ≤27.3kg men; ≤16.3 kg womenb 31 (43.7 %) 40 (56.3 %)
Dietary energy intake ≤70 % estimated energy requirementsa 42 (59.2 %) 29 (40.8 %)
SNAQ score ≤14c 21 (29.6 %) 50 (70.4 %)
MUAMC: ≤23.49 cm men; ≤20.84 womenb (n = 142) 39 (54.9 %) 32 (45.1 %)

BMI body mass index, ASM appendicular skeletal muscle, SNAQ Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire, MUAMC mid-upper arm muscle circumference

aDiagnostic cut-offs from the proposed diagnostic algorithm for cachexia were derived from Evans et al. [18]

bScreening tool diagnostic criteria cut-offs for isometric hand-grip strength and MUAMC were obtained from wave 1 of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ALSA) [35]

cA score ≤14 for SNAQ identifies persons with anorexia at risk of significant weight loss of at least 5 % within 6 months [38]