Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2013 Jun 25;16(5):653–664. doi: 10.1111/desc.12077

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regressions of Age and Education Predicting Fractional Anisotropy

Dependent Variable: Fractional Anistropy Step Model R2 change Sig F change Beta P
Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus 1 Age 0.027 0.271 0.164 0.271

2 Age 0.738 0.002
Years of Education 0.189 0.002 -0.720 0.002

Cingulum Bundle 1 Age 0.029 0.252 0.171 0.252

2 Age 0.747 0.002
Years of Education 0.191 0.002 -0.723 0.002

Anterior Corona Radiata 1 Age 0.019 0.357 0.137 0.357

2 Age 0.700 0.002
Years of Education 0.182 0.003 -0.706 0.003

Uncinate Fasiculus 1 Age 0.016 0.398 0.398 0.398

2 Age 0.572 0.572
Years of Education 0.040 0.178 0.178 0.178

In each region of interest (ROI), hierarchical regressions were conducted with age and then years of education as independent variables. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values in each respective ROI were the dependent variables. When adjusting for age, educational attainment significantly predicted FA in the superior longitudinal fasiculus, the cingulum bundle, and the anterior corona radiata, three ROIs that have previously been linked with cognitive control. In contrast, years of education did not account for variance in FA in the uncinate fasiculus, a control region which has not been linked to cognitive control.