Table 4.
Dependent Variable: Fractional Anistropy | Step | Model | R2 change | Sig F change | Beta | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus | 1 | Age | 0.027 | 0.271 | 0.164 | 0.271 |
2 | Age | 0.738 | 0.002 | |||
Years of Education | 0.189 | 0.002 | -0.720 | 0.002 | ||
Cingulum Bundle | 1 | Age | 0.029 | 0.252 | 0.171 | 0.252 |
2 | Age | 0.747 | 0.002 | |||
Years of Education | 0.191 | 0.002 | -0.723 | 0.002 | ||
Anterior Corona Radiata | 1 | Age | 0.019 | 0.357 | 0.137 | 0.357 |
2 | Age | 0.700 | 0.002 | |||
Years of Education | 0.182 | 0.003 | -0.706 | 0.003 | ||
Uncinate Fasiculus | 1 | Age | 0.016 | 0.398 | 0.398 | 0.398 |
2 | Age | 0.572 | 0.572 | |||
Years of Education | 0.040 | 0.178 | 0.178 | 0.178 |
In each region of interest (ROI), hierarchical regressions were conducted with age and then years of education as independent variables. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values in each respective ROI were the dependent variables. When adjusting for age, educational attainment significantly predicted FA in the superior longitudinal fasiculus, the cingulum bundle, and the anterior corona radiata, three ROIs that have previously been linked with cognitive control. In contrast, years of education did not account for variance in FA in the uncinate fasiculus, a control region which has not been linked to cognitive control.