Table 1.
Bivariate Meta-Regression Models | Multiple Predictor Meta-Regression Models | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k | B | S.E. | 95% CI | Beta | τ2 | k | B | S.E. | 95% CI | Beta | τ2 | |
Risk Model | 48 | .03 | 48 | .03 | ||||||||
Constant | −.16 | .10 | −.36, .05 | - | −.16 | .13 | −.42, .94 | - | ||||
Risk | .22 | .11 | .01, .44 | .27 | .22 | .12 | −.01, .45 | .27 | ||||
Methods quality | −.08 | .08 | −.24, .08 | −.13 | ||||||||
Publication status | .08 | .08 | −.07, .23 | .14 | ||||||||
Needs* Model | 51 | .04 | 51 | .04 | ||||||||
Constant | .01 | .05 | −.08, .10 | - | .02 | .06 | −.10, .14 | - | ||||
Needs | .05 | .03 | −.02, .11 | .17 | .04 | .03 | −.02, .10 | .15 | ||||
Methods quality | −.08 | .08 | −.24, .08 | −.14 | ||||||||
Publication status | .06 | .08 | −.09, .21 | .10 | ||||||||
Responsivity Model | 22 | .03 | 22 | .04 | ||||||||
Constant | −.05 | .08 | −.21, .10 | - | −.02 | .11 | −.23, .18 | - | ||||
Responsivity | .09 | .06 | −.02, .20 | .33 | .08 | .06 | −.03, .20 | .29 | ||||
Methods quality | −.17 | .15 | −.47, .13 | −.32 | ||||||||
Publication status | .07 | .15 | −.22, .37 | .14 | ||||||||
Appropriate Service Model | 12 | .05 | 12 | .05 | ||||||||
Constant | −.33 | .22 | −.76, .11 | - | −.29 | .27 | −.82, .24 | - | ||||
Appropriate Service | .18 | .12 | −.05, .41 | .46 | .09 | .14 | −.17, .36 | .24 | ||||
Methods quality | −.31 | .26 | −.83, .21 | −.52 | ||||||||
Publication status | .39 | .31 | −.22, .99 | .51 |
Number of criminogenic services for the E group minus the number of criminogenic services for the C group, then Winsorized at 7.