Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Criminol. 2013 May 3;9(3):275–300. doi: 10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z

Table 4.

ANOVA-analog meta-analysis of Hedges'gfor crime by the difference in responsivity between the E group and the C group (k = 22)

Responsivity
difference
Mean
Hedges'g
SE Lower
95%CI
Upper
95%CI
Crime

0 (k = 7) −0.07 0.09 −0.24 0.11
1 (k = 7) 0.06 0.09 −0.12 0.24
2 (k = 7) 0.12 0.10 −0.07 0.31
3 (k = 1) 0.22 0.19 −0.16 0.60
Q between: Q= 3.06, df = 3, p = .38
Drug Use

Responsivity
difference
Mean
Hedges'g
SE Lower
95%CI
Upper
95%CI

−1 (k = 1) −0.48 0.27 −1.01 0.05
0 (k = 49) 0.17 0.04 0.09 0.24
1 (k = 31) 0.28 0.04 0.20 0.36
2 (k = 35) 0.16 0.04 0.08 0.25
3 (k = 9) 0.29 0.08 0.14 0.44

Q Between: Q = 12.85, df = 4, p = .012