Table 1.
Method/ Stem |
AA | SA-aabb | SA-abab | SA-abab-2 | SA- aaab |
3AA+1SS | AS | SA-aaaa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMoptb | 0 | +0.4 (+7.4) | +9.8 | −4.4 (+2.6) | +3.9 | +6.8 | +16.7 | −21.5 (+6.5) |
QM→MMoptc | 0 | −27.0 (−20.3) | −14.8 | −31.3 (−25.6) | −22.9 | +2.1 | −2.7 | −53.9(−20.9) |
Differenced | 0 | −27.4 (−27.7) | −24.6 | −26.9 (−28.2) | −26.8 | −4.7 | −19.4 | −32.4 (−27.4) |
QM→MMoptOL4e | 0 | −34.0 | −17.7 | −39.6 | −31.4 | +3.7 | −4.9 | −58.4 |
Cang et al. 34f | 0 | −14.6(−20.2) | −14.4(−20.0) | −14.4(−20.0) | −13.4(−19.0) | +4.6(+6.0) | + ~14 | N/A |
Intramolecular O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds in 5′-terminal syn guanosines are present in the following structures: SA-aabb, one interaction; SA-abab-2, one interaction; SA-aaaa, four interactions. All these interactions exist in the original X-ray structures. There is one O5′H…N2(G) H-bond in the SA-abab system. The H-bonds are consistently present/absent in both QMopt and QM→MMopt structures and thus should not systematically affect the comparison of QM and MM relative energies.
Optimization using the DFT-D3 COSMO approach starting from the initial structure. The estimates in parentheses were obtained by deducting 7 kcal/mol per each syn nucleotide terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bond (see the text).
Optimization using the parmbsc0 force field and PB method starting from the QMopt structure. Values in parentheses show the energies with elimination of the terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds (see the text).
Difference between MM and QM relative energies. The estimates in parentheses were obtained when considering the deductions of the energies of the terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds.
Optimization using the parmbsc0+χOL4 force field and PB method starting from the QMopt structure.
MD MM-PBSA free energy computations compiled from the Table 1 by Cang et al34 with −4.4 (−3.0 in parenthesis) kcal/mol correction per each 5′-terminal syn base to deduct contributions of all O5′H…N3(G) intramolecular H-bonds (for more details see the original study and the Method section).