Table 2.
Method/ Stem |
AA | SA-aabb | SA- abab |
SA-abab-2 | SA- aaab |
3AA+1S S |
AS | SA-aaaa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMoptb | 0 | +16.6 (+26.6) | +28.7 | +4.6 (+14.6) | +19.1 | +17.0 | −6.3 | −18.7 (+21.3) |
QM→MMoptc | 0 | −9.9 (+5.3) | +5.7 | −25.1 (−15.6) | −5.0 | +17.9 | −12.4 | −60.3 (+1.0) |
Differenced | 0 | −26.5 (−21.3) | −23.0 | −29.7 (−30.2) | −24.1 | +0.9 | −6.1 | −41.6 (−20.3) |
T2-T1e | +0.9 (+6.4) | +1.6 | −2.8 (−2.0) | +2.7 | +5.6 | +13.3 | −9.2 (+7.1) |
For energies of all the individual GpG dinucleotides, see Supporting InformationTable S2. The values in parentheses are without the 5′ terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds (cf. Table 1).
Optimization using the DFT-D3 COSMO approach starting from the initial structure.
Optimization using the parmbsc0 force field and PB method starting from the QMopt structure.
Difference between MM and QM relative energies. The estimates in parentheses were obtained when considering the deductions of the energies of the terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds.