Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Jun 19;135(26):9785–9796. doi: 10.1021/ja402525c

Table 2.

Sum of the relative energies of the four 5′-GpG-3′dinucleotides of the 2-quartet G-DNA stems evaluated as gas phase single points (kcal/mol).a>

Method/
Stem
AA SA-aabb SA-
abab
SA-abab-2 SA-
aaab
3AA+1S
S
AS SA-aaaa
QMoptb 0 +16.6 (+26.6) +28.7 +4.6 (+14.6) +19.1 +17.0 −6.3 −18.7 (+21.3)
QM→MMoptc 0 −9.9 (+5.3) +5.7 −25.1 (−15.6) −5.0 +17.9 −12.4 −60.3 (+1.0)
Differenced 0 −26.5 (−21.3) −23.0 −29.7 (−30.2) −24.1 +0.9 −6.1 −41.6 (−20.3)
T2-T1e +0.9 (+6.4) +1.6 −2.8 (−2.0) +2.7 +5.6 +13.3 −9.2 (+7.1)
a

For energies of all the individual GpG dinucleotides, see Supporting InformationTable S2. The values in parentheses are without the 5′ terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds (cf. Table 1).

b

Optimization using the DFT-D3 COSMO approach starting from the initial structure.

c

Optimization using the parmbsc0 force field and PB method starting from the QMopt structure.

d

Difference between MM and QM relative energies. The estimates in parentheses were obtained when considering the deductions of the energies of the terminal O5′H…N3(G) H-bonds.

e

Difference between predictions from Tables 2 and 1 (lines “Difference”).