Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 5;23(5):329–336. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120174

Table 5. Odds ratio (95% CIs) for the association between thigh circumference and diabetes among 116 205 women aged 30–79 years.

Percentile of thigh
circumference (cm)
Age, years Body mass index, kg/m2


<50
(1044/92 224)
50–64
(1454/20 073)
65+
(631/3908)
<23
(875/76 989)
23–24.9
(726/19 843)
25+
(1528/19 373)
2.5 (<45) 4.29 (2.59–7.08) 2.55 (1.80–3.64) 2.31 (1.59–3.37) 2.86 (2.15–3.81) 2.26 (1.25–4.11) 0.90 (0.30–2.68)
5 (45–<47) 2.18 (1.07–4.44) 2.66 (1.77–3.99) 2.20 (1.39–3.49) 2.35 (1.64–3.36) 2.55 (1.47–4.44) 1.47 (0.51–4.22)
10 (47–<48) 2.20 (1.59–3.06) 2.30 (1.83–2.89) 1.54 (1.11–2.15) 2.30 (1.85–2.86) 1.80 (1.28–2.52) 1.38 (0.87–2.17)
25 (48–<51) 1.56 (1.21–2.02) 1.61 (1.32–1.95) 1.56 (1.19–2.04) 1.66 (1.37–2.03) 1.37 (1068–1.77) 1.64 (1.23–2.20)
50 (51–<57) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
75 (57–<60) 0.62 (0.52–0.75) 0.83 (0.71–0.97) 0.96 (0.72–1.29) 0.64 (0.48–0.86) 0.52 (0.41–0.66) 0.88 (0.76–1.02)
90 (60–<62) 0.48 (0.37–0.61) 0.68 (0.54–0.86) 0.90 (0.57–1.44) 0.49 (0.26–0.92) 0.35 (0.23–0.54) 0.68 (0.56–0.82)
95 (62–<64) 0.42 (0.32–0.55) 0.59 (0.44–0.79) 1.01 (0.55–1.86) 0.10 (0.01–0.75) 0.36 (0.20–0.66) 0.60 (0.49–0.74)
97.5 (≥65) 0.21 (0.15–0.28) 0.45 (0.32–0.62) 0.60 (0.30–1.20) 0.22 (0.03–1.78) 0.51 (0.25–1.04) 0.37 (0.30–0.47)
AUC 0.840 (0.827–0.852) 0.756 (0.743–0.768) 0.690 (0.668–0.713) 0.866 (0.853–0.879) 0.820 (0.804–0.835) 0.772 (0.760–0.783)

Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve.

Model adjusted for age, smoking, exercise, family history of diabetes, body mass index, and waist circumference.