Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;8(9):e75503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075503

Table 1. Pairwise comparisons of different plant species and treatment δD (‰) for 2009 and 2010.

28-Jun-2009 28-Jul-2009 23-Aug-2009
LEPU vs. POSA ** KOPY vs ANTA * KOPY vs. POFR *
KOPY vs. OXST ** LEPU vs. POFR *
KOPY vs. POFR **
LEPU vs. POFR *
LEPU vs. OXST *
8 -Jun-2010 9-Jul-2010 3-Aug-2010 25-Aug-2010
KOPY vs. POSA ** KOPY vs. POFR ** KOPY vs. ASRI * POSA vs. POFR *
KOPY vs. POFR ** KOPY vs. ASRI ** LEPU vs. POSA **
KOPY vs. ASRI ** LEPU vs. POSA ** LEPU vs. ASRI **
LEPU vs. POFR ** LEPU vs. POFR *
LEPU vs. ASRI ** LEPU vs. ASRI ** S vs. W *
POSA vs. ASRI ** S vs. WS *
POSA vs. POFR **
C vs WS *

There were no treatments in 2009. Non-statistically significant comparisons were not included. Rooting depths from shallow to deep are as follows (5–35 cm): Kobresia pygmaea (KOPY), Leontopodium pusillum (LEPU), Potentilla saundersiana (POSA), Potentilla fruticosa (POFR), Oxygropis stracheyana (OXST), Astragalus rigidulus (ASRI). The four treatments were: C = control, W = warming, S = snow addition, WS = warming×snow addition. * signifies P<0.05, ** signifies P<0.005.