Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;8(9):e74409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074409

Table 1. Relationship between VEZT expression levels in cancer tissues and clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer.

Factors No. of patients Mean expression of VEZT(mean±SD) P-value
Gender
Male 57 14.87±2.03 1.382
Female 47 15.47±3.15
Age(year)
<65 49 18.62±2.15 0.584
≥65 55 13.11±3.45
Tumor size
<5cm 51 17.16±3.05 2.682
≥5cm 53 11.26±3.52
Cell differentiation
Poor differentiation 68 18.21±1.65 1.827
Moderate differentiation 36 16.6±2.46
Gross appearance
Borrmann Ⅰ+Ⅱtype 32 17.25±3.46 2.361
Borrmann Ⅲ+Ⅳtype 72 15.21±6.58
Site of tumor
Cardia 21 19.34±2.53 0.692
Body 36 11.24±2.61
Antrum 47 17.35±2.87
Lymphatic metastasis
Positive 74 7.42±7.25 0.027*
Negative 30 18.26±9.32
Depth of cancer invasion
T2 25 18.35±7.82 0.041*
T3 63 22.12±4.21
T4 16 24.78±5.41
Distal metastasis
Positive 24 9.34±6.09 1.032
Negative 80 12.35±8.62
TNM# Stage
15 6.35±7.16 0.0385*
28 16.37±4.56
48 17.24±1.41
13 7.41±2.36

We analyzed the relationship between VEZT expression levels in cancer tissues and clinicopathological factors in gastric cancer samples versus adjacent normal tissue (n = 104). We found that the expression level of VEZT was significantly associated with lymphatic metastasis, depth of cancer invasion and TNM stage (Table 1, P < 0.05). However, VEZT expression levels were not associated with gender, age, tumor size, cell differentiation, gross appearance, site of tumor and distant metastasis.

#: TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; *p < 0.05.