Table 2.
B | SE | β | |
---|---|---|---|
Romantic attachment representations at ages 20–21a | |||
Infant attachment security | 0.34 | 0.43 | .09 |
OXTR | −0.33 | 0.36 | −.11 |
DRD4 | −0.34 | 0.35 | −.11 |
5HTT | 0.05 | 0.25 | .02 |
Infant attachment security x OXTR | 0.94 | 0.85 | .12 |
Infant attachment security x DRD4 | −1.30 | 0.84 | −.17 |
Infant attachment security x 5HTT | 0.82 | 0.62 | .15 |
Romantic attachment representations at ages 26–28b | |||
Infant attachment security | 0.84 | 0.58 | .17 |
OXTR | 0.20 | 0.47 | .05 |
DRD4 | 0.26 | 0.48 | .06 |
5HTT | −0.36 | 0.34 | −.11 |
Infant attachment security x OXTR | 2.23 | 1.05 | .23* |
Infant attachment security x DRD4 | 0.56 | 1.32 | .05 |
Infant attachment security x 5HTT | −0.03 | 0.91 | −.01 |
Note: all models control for sex and race;
n = 74.
n = 70.
p < .05.