Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2013 Jul 2;74(1):128–139. doi: 10.1002/ana.23897

Table 1.

Comparisons of passive and evoked membrane electrical properties of bipolar- and pyramidal-shaped induced neurons between control and DS patients.

Group Resting Vm
(mV)
Input
Resistance
(GΩ)
VThreshold
(mV)
AP Amplitude
(mV)
AP
Frequency
(Hz)
B-Ctrl −67.15 ± 1.37
(33)
1.25 ± 0.15
(33)
−23.67 ± 1.51
(30)
114.90 ± 4.69
(34)
3.48 ± 0.73
(27)
B-DS −58.55 ± 1.28**
(45)
1.24 ± 0.12
(45)
−30.83 ± 1.53**
(37)
121.18 ± 3.26
(37)
11.6 ± 1.33**
(37)
P-Ctrl −63.05 ± 2.72
(9)
1.02 ± 0.34
(9)
−20.51 ± 3.37
(8)
125.38 ± 5.14
(8)
5.10 ± 2.66
(7)
P-DS −58.08 ± 1.24
(31)
1.02 ± 0.17
(31)
−37.32 ± 1.51**
(26)
114.35 ± 3.97
(26)
12.64 ± 1.99*
(24)

Values are mean ± SEM; cell numbers in parentheses.

Abbreviations: Resting Vm, resting membrane potential; VThreshold, threshold membrane potential for evoking an action potential (AP); AP Amplitude, Spike height measured from the resting membrane potential level to the peak; AP Frequency, the frequency of repetitive firing of a given iPSC in response to injection of a 1500 ms depolarizing current pulse (0.02 nA); B-Ctrl, bipolar-shaped neurons from control iPSCs; B-DS, bipolar-shaped neurons from DS iPSCs; P-Ctrl, pyramidal-shaped neurons from conrol iPSCs; P-DS, pyramidal-shaped neurons from DS iPSCs.

*

p<0.05;

**

P < 0.001,

Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test.