Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2013 Sep 18;33(38):15145–15160. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2118-13.2013

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/3315145-16$15.00/0

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 12. — Summary of model weights. Comparison of weights (w_a, w_v, w_p) calculated from best-fit model for NU and PIVC, VIP, and MSTd. A, B, Cumulative distributions of the ratio of acceleration to velocity weights (w_a/w_v) from model AccVel during vestibular (NU, n = 39; PIVC, n = 45; VIP, n = 30; MSTd, n = 48) and visual (NU, n = 11; VIP, n = 76; MSTd, n = 119) stimuli. Histograms along the top show the distributions of vestibular and visual weight ratios (w_a/w_v) for NU Purkinje cells, color coded according to the best model fit. C, Comparison of vestibular and visual weight ratios (w_a/w_v) for multisensory Purkinje cells (n = 11). D, E, Cumulative distributions of the position weights (w_p) from model AccVelPos during vestibular (NU, n = 39; PIVC, n = 45; VIP, n = 30; MSTd, n = 48) and visual (NU, n = 11; VIP, n = 76; MSTd, n = 119) stimuli. Histograms along the top show the distributions of vestibular and visual position weights for NU Purkinje cells, color coded according to the best model fit. F, Comparison of vestibular and visual position weights (w_p) for multisensory Purkinje cells (n = 11). Data for cortical areas have been replotted from Chen et al. (2011a,b).