Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Jul 17;24(10):1849–1863. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0262-5

Table 3.

Multinomial regression models: trajectory of stress in relation to smoking pattern; adjustment for age, gender, race, education, and incomea

Non-smoker Persistent smoker Ex-smoker Relapsed Ex-Smoker Wald F P Value
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)

Relationship Stress b
High-High 1.00 1.34 (1.02, 1.77)* 0.91 (0.61, 1.36) 1.47 (0.74, 2.90) 0.17
High-Low 1.00 1.14 (0.85, 1.51) 0.90 (0.61, 1.32) 2.08 (1.18, 3.65)*
Low-High 1.00 1.23 (0.95, 1.61) 0.93 (0.65, 1.34) 1.36 (0.73, 2.50)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Stress
High-High 1.00 1.64 (1.19, 2.25)* 1.61 (1.08, 2.40)* 1.88 (0.95, 3.71) 0.07
High-Low 1.00 1.23 (0.92, 1.65) 1.05 (0.71, 1.57) 0.77 (0.35, 1.72)
Low-High 1.00 1.28 (0.93, 1.77) 1.03 (0.62, 1.70) 1.28 (0.57, 2.89)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Stress c
High-High 1.00 1.36 (1.00, 1.84)* 1.50 (1.03, 2.18)* 0.56 (0.23, 1.38) 0.22
High-Low 1.00 1.28 (0.98, 1.67) 1.08 (0.74, 1.58) 0.67 (0.34, 1.33)
Low-High 1.00 1.14 (0.86, 1.49) 1.07 (0.75, 1.52) 0.88 (0.47, 1.64)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work-Family Spillover c
High-High 1.00 1.09 (0.81, 1.47) 1.33 (0.91, 1.93) 1.30 (0.67, 2.55) 0.76
High-Low 1.00 1.01 (0.74, 1.36) 1.10 (0.76, 1.61) 1.08 (0.55, 2.13)
Low-High 1.00 0.83 (0.63, 1.09) 0.94 (0.65, 1.36) 1.22 (0.68, 2.18)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Perceived Inequality c,d
High-High 1.00 1.44 (1.10, 1.88)** 1.00 (0.67, 1.48) 1.38 (0.62, 3.06) 0.02
High-Low 1.00 1.39 (1.06, 1.82)* 1.06 (0.73, 1.54) 2.51 (1.42, 4.44)**
Low-High 1.00 1.13 (0.84, 1.52) 0.97 (0.66, 1.42) 2.13 (1.13, 4.01)*
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Neighborhood
High-High 1.00 1.04 (0.79, 1.38) 1.10 (0.75, 1.62) 1.40 (0.74, 2.68) 0.92
High-Low 1.00 1.18 (0.90, 1.55) 1.06 (0.73, 1.54) 0.97 (0.50, 1.90)
Low-High 1.00 1.12 (0.83, 1.52) 1.06 (0.68, 1.65) 1.33 (0.69, 2.55)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Discrimination
High-High 1.00 1.29 (0.96, 1.72) 1.26 (0.86, 1.84) 1.04 (0.52, 2.06) 0.55
High-Low 1.00 1.23 (0.92, 1.63) 1.16 (0.78,1.73) 1.02 (0.40, 2.58)
Low-High 1.00 0.99 (0.74, 1.33) 1.27 (0.89, 1.82) 1.50 (0.78, 2.88)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recent Problems b,d
High-High 1.00 1.87 (1.42, 2.46)*** 1.14 (0.77, 1.69) 1.09 (0.57, 2.09) 0.01
High-Low 1.00 1.45 (1.12, 1.88)** 1.24 (0.88, 1.74) 1.10 (0.59, 2.04)
Low-High 1.00 1.02 (0.78, 1.34) 1.01 (0.70, 1.47) 0.78 (0.39, 1.60)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cumulative Stress Score b,c,d
High-High 1.00 1.40 (1.08, 1.81)* 1.10 (0.76, 1.61) 1.16 (0.61, 2.22) 0.22
High-Low 1.00 1.52 (1.15, 2.02)** 1.11 (0.76, 1.63) 1.46 (0.80, 2.65)
Low-High 1.00 1.08 (0.81, 1.45) 1.09 (0.73, 1.62) 1.12 (0.55, 2.26)
Low-Low 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.0001.

a

All models account for potential clustering among siblings and twins, and are adjusted for age (years, 4 categories:<=34, 35–44, 45–54, 55+); gender (male, female); race/ethnicity (5-category: White, Black, Hispanic, Other); income (4 categories, <=$25,000, $25,000–44,999, $45,000–69,999, $70,000+); education (3 categories: less than or equal to high school, some college, bachelor’s degree +).

b

Adjusted for covariates in Note 1, in addition to marital/partner status at baseline and follow-up (not married at baseline and follow-up, married at baseline and follow-up, married at baseline not at follow-up, not married at baseline married at follow-up).

c

Adjusted for covariates in footnote a, in addition to employment at baseline and follow-up (not working at baseline and follow-up, working at baseline and follow-up, working at baseline not at follow-up, not working at baseline working at follow-up).

d

Adjusted for covariates in Note 1, in addition to report of having any children (baseline).