Table 3.
Emotional quality of life at T1 (n = 80) | Physical quality of life at T1 (n = 72) | Social quality of life at T1 (n = 80) | |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of life at T0a | 0.69*** | 0.56*** | 0.58*** |
Background characteristics | |||
Age | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
Gender (Male) | 0.03 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
Chronic condition | |||
Diabetes | 0.01 | 0.27** | 0.03 |
Neuromuscular disorder | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.01 |
Satisfaction with transitional care | |||
T0 Gap score | 0.10 | −0.07 | 0.18 |
T1 Gap score | −0.20* | −0.10 | −0.35** |
Adjusted R2 | 51.7 % | 42.7 % | 39.8 % |
F | 13.252 | 8.664 | 7.306 |
*** p ≤ 0.001; ** p ≤ 0.01; * p ≤ 0.05 (two-tailed). Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is the reference group of the chronic conditions. Listwise deletion of missing cases was used for the analyses. Findings are based on respondents who filled in the questionnaire at both T0 and T1 only
aEmotional quality of life at T0 was used as independent variable to asses the longitudinal relationship with emotional quality of life at T1. Physical quality of life at T0 was used as independent variable to asses the longitudinal relationship with physical quality of life at T1. Social quality of life at T0 was used as independent variable to asses the longitudinal relationship with social quality of life at T1