Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2013 Aug 8;126(3):327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.005

Table 4.

(a) Pearson correlations (and the relevant p values) between the strength of the S parameter (as an index of lexical-semantic processing in production) and various lexical and semantic comprehension scores, in a sample of 103 aphasic patients. Reported P values are corrected for the number of tests and are comparable to α = 0.05. (b) Pearson correlations (and their relevant p values) between the strength of the P parameter (as an index of lexical-phonological processing in production) and various input processing measures, in a sample of 103 aphasic patients. Reported P values are corrected for the number of tests and are comparable to α = 0.05.

(a)

Pyramids & Palm Trees Camels & Cactus Synonym Judgment Lexical Decision (words) Lexical Decision (Nonwords)
Pearson's r .50 .61 .50 .32 .29
P value <.001 <.001 <.001 .005 .015
(b)

Auditory Discrimination (Non-delayed) Lexical Decision(words) Lexical Decision (Nonwords)
Pearson's r .19 .17 .2
P value .18 .27 .12