Table 2. Overview of evaluated PRO instruments in advanced-stage GC: characteristics and psychometric evidence.
| EORTC QLQ-C30 | EORTC QLQ-STO22 | FACT-G | FACT-Ga | MDASI-GI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts measured | Function (five subscales: physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social) five symptoms (fatigue, nausea or vomiting, pain, dyspnea, diarrhoea), global health status and QOL, and financial impact | Symptoms: Dysphagia (four items) Pain or discomfort (three items) Upper GI symptoms (three items) Eating restrictions (five items) Emotional (three items) Dry mouth, hair loss, and body image | Physical well-being (seven items); social/ family well-being (seven items); emotional well-being (six items); functional well-being (seven items) | GC symptoms and impacts (e.g., pain, reflux, dysphagia, eating difficulties, tiredness, weakness, interference, and difficulty planning) | GI symptoms (constipation, diarrhoea, difficulty swallowing, change in taste, and feeling bloated), general cancer symptoms (13 items), and interference (six items) |
| Number of items/Time to complete/Response rate | 30 (version 3.0) 10 min [24] Less than 4% missing for all items [34] | 22 15 min for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQSTO22 [24] Less than 8% missing for all items [33] | 27 (version 4) Time and response rate not reported | 19 Time and response rate not reported | 24 2–3 min Missing data rate of 0.18% [26] |
| Population of intended use | Cancer patients | Patients with GC, varying in disease stage, and treatment modality | Cancer patients | Patients with GC, varying in disease stage, and treatment modality | Patients with any GI cancer (not only GC) |
| Response options | 28 items with a four-point Likert scale; two items with a seven-point numerical scale | Four-point Likert scale | Five-point Likert scale | Five-point Likert scale | 11-point NRS |
| Recall period | Past week | Past week | Past seven days | Past seven days | Last 24 h |
| Scoring | Scores range from 0 to 100 (raw scores for items or summed subscales are transformed to 0–100) High score = worse symptoms or better function | Five subscale scores and three single-item scores High score = worse symptoms or more problems; further details not available | Subscale scores range from 0 to 24; from 0 to 28 according to the number of items in subscale Total score: 0–108 Higher score = better QOL | One subscale score range 0–76 Higher score = better QOL | Scores range from 0 to 10 for individual items Mean scale scores can be computed for the 13 symptom-severity items and for the six interference items |
| Internal consistency reliability | Yes [27] | Yes [24, 27, 33] | No evidence | Yes [25, 30] | Yes [26] |
| Test-retest reliability | No evidence | Yes [24, 34] | No evidence | Yes [25] | No evidence |
| Content validitya | Yes: cognitive debriefing [24] | Yes: concept elicitation [29] Yes: cognitive debriefing [24] | No evidence | Some patient inputs [30] Yes: cognitive debriefing [30] | Yes: patient interviews [26] Yes: cognitive debriefing [26] |
| Construct validity | Yes [27, 34] | Yes [24, 33, 34, 27] | No evidence | Yes [25] | Yes [26] |
| Ability to detect change | Some evidence [24] | Yes [24] | No evidence | Yes [25] | No evidence |
| Data-collection method | Self-administered; interviewer administered | No details available | Self-administered; interviewer-administered | No details available | No details available |
| Instrument adminis tration mode | Paper-pencil; computer-administered | No details available | Paper-pencil Computer-administered programs are under development | No details available | Paper-pencil |
| Cultural and language validation | Over 81 languages [35] | 38 languages [35] | Over 53 languages [36] | Japanese translation [25, 30] | Chinese translation [37] |
aContent validity as evidenced by patient involvement in concept elicitation and/or item generation.
EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (core measure).
EORTC QLQ-STO22: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Gastric Cancer Module.
FACT-G: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.
FACT-Ga: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric Cancer.
GC: gastric cancer.
GI: gastrointestinal.
MDASI-GI: MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Gastrointestinal Cancer.
NRS: numerical rating scale.
QOL: quality of life.
PRO: patient-reported outcome.