Table 3. Analysis of Reading speed.
Main effects model | Final model | |||||||||
Effect | Estimate | Std. Err. | DF | t Value | p value | Estimate | Std. Err. | DF | t Value | p value |
Intercept | −3.21 | 0.75 | 196 | −4.3 | <.0001 | −3.69 | 0.78 | 241 | −4.74 | <.0001 |
method | −0.02 | 0.06 | 191 | −0.39 | 0.6984 | 1.04 | 0.53 | 188 | 1.97 | 0.0508 |
VA Span | 0.02 | 0.12 | 195 | 0.21 | 0.8351 | |||||
SW | 0.03 | 0.01 | 194 | 3.34 | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 195 | 3.37 | 0.0009 |
PD | 0.04 | 0.01 | 194 | 3.84 | 0.0002 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 232 | 4.45 | <.0001 |
method*PD | −0.01 | 0.01 | 189 | −2.02 | 0.0451 |
Notes to Table 3: N(subjects) = 103; N(observations) = 387. Whereas there was no significant interaction between method and SW in the full dataset, such an interaction was present when the analysis was restricted to only the level 7 texts.