Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 18;8(9):e73795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073795

Table 2. Genetic differentiation of Myrtus nivellei.

Source Degree of freedom Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variance (%) ФPT statistics
Hoggar (microsatellites) Among wadis 3 20.740 0.552 13 0.131
Within wadis 22 80.183 3.645 87
Hoggar (AFLP) Among wadis 3 24.308 0.865 23 0.225
Within wadis 22 65.500 2.977 77
Tassili n’Immidir (microsatellites) Among wadis 6 44.154 0.620 17 0.166
Within wadis 47 146.624 3.120 83
Tassili n’Immidir (AFLP) Among wadis 6 30.259 0.504 24 0.240
Within wadis 47 75.167 1.599 76
Tassili n’Ajjer (microsatellites) Among wadis 8 71.343 1.546 32 0.319
Within wadis 25 82.539 3.302 68
Tassili n’Ajjer (AFLP) Among wadis 8 40.259 0.496 13 0.133
Within wadis 25 80.800 3.232 87
Whole sampling (microsatellites) Among mountains 2 327.99 4.325 51 0.514
Within mountains 114 466.591 4.095 49
Whole sampling (AFLP) Among mountains 2 120.236 1.549 35 0.353
Within mountains 114 324.226 2.844 65

Results of the analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) on microsatellite and AFLP markers for samples of Myrtus nivellei were analyzed for each central Saharan mountain range.