Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 11;28(10):2720–2727. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det292

Table II.

Meta-analysis of included data (to 2011): BMI and IVF outcomes in women using donor oocytes.

BMI category (kg/m2) Number of studiesa Sample size Statistical model RR (95%CI) Statistical heterogeneity (I2, %)
Implantation (n = 4758)
 <20 6 791 Random effects 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 0
 20–24.9 2665 Reference
 25–29.9 6 892 Random effects 0.92 (0.822–1.02) 0
 >30 6 410 Random effects 0.93 (0.80–1.07) 0
Clinical pregnancy (n = 4662)
 <20 5 784 Random effects 1.03 (0.93–1.15) 44.8
 20–24.9 2613 Reference
 25–29.9 5 867 Random effects 0.94 (0.88–1.01) 0
 >30 5 398 Random effects 0.98 (0.83–1.15) 61.6
Miscarriage (n = 4662)
 <20 5 784 Random effects 0.92 (0.73–1.17) 0
 20–24.9 2613 Reference
 25–29.9 5 867 Random effects 0.90 (0.59–1.34) 45.3
 >30 5 398 Random effects 1.12 (0.83–1.50) 0
Live birth (n = 568)
 <20 3 24 Random effects 0.83 (0.57–1.21) 0
 20–24.9 224 Reference
 25–29.9 3 176 Random effects 1.02 (0.82–1.25) 0
 >30 3 144 Random effects 0.91 (0.65–1.27) 47.9

RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence intervals.

aData were available for each outcome from the following studies as listed:

Implantation: Wattanakumtornkul et al. (2003); Styne-Gross et al. (2005); Bellver et al. (2007); Bodri et al. (2010); DeUgarte et al. (2010; Washington University IVF center data; Clinical pregnancy and miscarriage: Styne-Gross et al. (2005); Bellver et al. (2007); Bodri et al. (2010); DeUgarte et al. (2010), Washington University IVF center data; Live birth: Wattanakumtornkul et al. (2003); DeUgarte et al. (2010), Washington University IVF center data.