Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 10;2:542–548. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.018

Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics of the 5 patients with AOA2.

Family Patient Nucleotide change (exon) Age at onset Disease duration Initial symptom Oculomotor phenotype Tendon reflexes Deep sensory loss Functional score ICARS total (/100) MMSE (/30) FAB (/18) EMG AFP level Height (cm)
I I-1 5413C > T (10) 18 10 Gait ataxia, writing ataxia, dysarthria Gaze-evoked nystagmus, saccadic smooth pursuit, absent fixation inhibition of VOR and staircase hypometric saccades (oculomotor apraxia)
*For family I: additional positional induced central vestibular nystagmus and vestibulo-ocular hyper-reflexia
Abolished Present 5 69 29 (draw) 18 Axonal sensory–motor neuropathy 60 168
I I-2 12 14 Dysarthria Abolished Present 4 50 29 (write) 17 (luria) Axonal sensory–motor neuropathy predominant in sensory 45.9 180
II II-1 7267G > A (23) 20 17 Gait ataxia Abolished Present 6 69 24/28 (write, calculation) 13 Axono-myelinic neuropathy 22.5 171
II II-2 17 24 Gait ataxia Abolished Present 6 68 24 (calculation) 18 ND 15 158
III III-3 6292C > T (15) 12 30 Gait ataxia Periodic alternating nystagmus Abolished Present 6 56 29 (reminder) 17 (fluency) ND 79 176

Functional score of motor disability was assessed by a seven-stage functional scale: 0 = normal; 1 = mild modifications at examination; 2 = mild functional disability, able to walk and run; 3 = able to walk without help up to 500 m, unable to run; 4 = needs unilateral help to walk; 5 = needs bilateral help to walk; 6 = wheelchair-bound; 7 = bedridden. ICARS total, Mini mental state examination (MMSE), Frontal assessment battery (FAB), electromyogram (EMG), Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels. ND: no data.