Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 19;9(9):e1003789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003789

Table 3. Comparison of the effects on tumorigenicity and the microenvironment of inhibiting different fibroblast-secreted factors.

Cal51+shHFFF2 Control shAREG shCCL2 shCCL8 shCCL7 shSTC1
Area under curve
Mean 1 0.37 0.27 0.58 0.26 0.60
SEM 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
pval <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01
Endpoint tumor volume
Mean 1 0.41 0.43 0.71 0.34 0.89
SEM 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04
p value <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 0.46
Tumor microenvironment
Proliferation 1 0.91 0.95 0.93 0.58 NA
p value 0.06 0.35 0.43 <0.01
Immune cells 1 0.81 0.33 0.52 1.11 NA
p value 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 0.34
Blood vessels 1 0.88 0.44 1 0.85 NA
p value 0.24 <0.01 0.98 0.11
Mesenchymal cells 1 0.17 0.77 0.63 0.78 NA
p value <0.01 0.08 0.051 0.11

Summary of results obtained from tumorigenicity assays and immunohistochemical characterization of the tumor microenvironment in AREG, CCL2, CCL7, CCL8 and STC1 silenced tumors compared to non-target control. Three major parameters, namely total area under the curve (AUC), endpoint tumor volume (week 6 post injection) and immunohistochemistry of tumor microenvironment were used to quantify differences between the control and experimental groups.