Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jul 14;22(3):944–954. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.002

Table 2.

Cyrillic letter training accuracy: percent correct for each participant for each session in matching Cyrillic graphemes to their corresponding phonemes (chance = 50%).

Participant
Session MC2 DN C1 C2
1 91.67 51.52 54.55 65.15
2 90.15 59.85 68.18 62.12
3 93.94 69.70 69.70 66.67
4 93.18 65.91 75.00 65.91
5 96.21 84.09 84.00 70.45
6 95.45 85.61 82.58 71.97
7 97.73 93.18 78.03 68.94
8 98.48 96.97 82.58 73.48
9 100
10 98.48
11 98.48
12 98.48