Table 8.
Effects of each QTL d | ∑ e f | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario
a
|
|
h
2
b
|
u
c
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
|
T1 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.2 |
0 |
S0 |
T2 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.2 |
1 |
-0.2 |
|
T3 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.2 |
1 |
|
T1 |
25 |
30 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
1 |
0.2 |
0 |
|
T2 |
25 |
35 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.2 |
1 |
-0.2 |
SI |
T3 |
25 |
30 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0 |
-0.2 |
1 |
|
Chr. |
– |
– |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
– |
– |
– |
|
Positione |
– |
– |
23 |
15 |
45 |
67 |
53 |
– |
– |
– |
|
T1 |
25 |
30 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
1 |
0.2 |
0 |
|
T2 |
18 |
35 |
0 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0 |
0.2 |
1 |
-0.2 |
SII |
T3 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0.46 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.2 |
1 |
|
Chr. |
– |
– |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
– |
– |
– |
|
Position |
– |
– |
23 |
15 |
45 |
67 |
53 |
– |
– |
– |
|
T1 |
18 |
30 |
0.54 |
0 |
0.54 |
0 |
0.54 |
1 |
0.2 |
– |
|
T2 |
18 |
35 |
0 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0 |
0.2 |
1 |
– |
SIII |
Chr. |
– |
– |
1 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
– |
– |
– |
Position | – | – | 23 | 33 | 45 | 38 | 53 | – | – | – |
Simulated genetic architecture of traits T1, T2, and T3, as dictated by QTL Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5.
a Scenario S0 is for type I error evaluation. Scenarios SI, SII and SIII are for model fitting evaluations.
b Heritability (%) due to all QTL affecting a trait.
c General mean of each trait.
d Main effect of QTL. The percentage of phenotypic variation of each trait due to each QTL is 5%.
e Position, in cM, of the QTL from the leftmost marker in the chromosome (Chr).
f Residual variance-covariance matrix.