Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics Clin Appl. 2013 Mar 6;7(0):264–272. doi: 10.1002/prca.201200031

Table 1.

LC/MS analysis for a 5-protein FFPE tissue surrogate

Condition % protein recovery Protein Identification by LC/ MS
% sequence Coverage*
% False protein ID’s ** Lysozyme Carbonic Anhydrase RNAse A BSA Myoglobin

Native Protein mixture 100% 3.3 ± 0.6 66% 56% 63% 54% 38%
FFPE; extracted in a water bath 26% 42 ± 4.0 15% n.d. 7% n.d. n.d.
FFPE, extracted with high pressure 96% 7.8 ± 1.5 69% 36% 59% 26% 28%

Multi-protein FFPE tissue surrogates were extracted at 100°C for 30 min followed by 80°C for 2 h in a water bath at atmospheric pressure or with high pressure (40,000 psi) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 2% (w/v) SDS buffer, pH 4. The extracts were washed extensively, and digested overnight with trypsin at 37°C in 50 mM NH4HCO3, pH 7.9 with 20% acetonitrile (v/v) before MS.

*

%Sequence coverage: percent of theoretical tryptic peptides identified by LC/MS/MS.

**

The false identification rate was determined as percentage of proteins incorrectly identified for spectra with scores ≥10.5, for 2 technical replicates. n.d. – none detected.