Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 May 8;36(2):10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.001. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.001

Table 2.

Operating Characteristics of the direct assignment option design vs. a Balanced randomized design based on 6000 simulations, and assuming stage I analysis at 50% accrual

Response Rate Ratio (treatment versus control) α= 0.10 α= 0.20

Balanced Randomized Design Design with Direct Assignment Option Balanced Randomized Design Design with Direct Assignment Option
Power (%) 2.00 80.6 79.3 79.3 78.0
2.25 90.5 89.0 88.0 86.3
2.50 96.5 95.5 94.5 93.2
3.00 99.7 99.3 99.0 98.7

Type I Error Rate (%) - 10.4 11.5 19.7 21.8

[1-β = 0.80; Response rate in the control arm = 0.20, Total planned sample size: 101 (α = 0.10); 65 (α =0.20)]