Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Immunotherapy. 2013 Mar;5(3):265–299. doi: 10.2217/imt.13.10

Table 7. Congestive heart failure (CHF), data from observational studies and meta-analyses.

No. of patients
(TNF/
Comparator)
Baseline disease
characteristics
(Duration, HAQ or
DAS scores)
Definition of HF At Risk
Period
Duration
of follow
up
Biologic Arm Comparator
Arm
Reported Incidence
Observational

Listing 2008 [58] RA
2757/1491
Duration: 9 yrs,
TNF vs. 6 yrs,
DMARD
DAS: 5.8 (1.2) vs.
5.1 (1.3)
Confirmed by
physician and
fulfillment of NYHA
classification
criteria
Time on
drug
3 years Etanercept,
Adalimumab,
Infliximab
Conventional
DMARDs
Risk of de novo heart failure HR (CI)
1.66 (0.67-4.10)a, b

Worsening of prevalent heart failure HR
(CI) 1.18 (0.30-4.73)a, b
Curtis 2007
[59]
4018 (RA and
CD); Age < 50
yrs
Not provided Identified using
diagnostic codes
Adjudicated by
physician review of
medical records
Within 9
months of
exposure
to drug
18
months
Infliximab,
etanercept
Non biologic
DMARDs
Risk of new onset HF in Anti TNF
exposed vs. unexposedc:

RR 4.3 (p NS) RA
RR 1.2 (p NS) CD
Cole et al 2007
[60]
103: RA patients
using TNF/ 100
RA controls/ 100
non RA controls
Not provided Identified using
ICD9 codes and
review of medical
records
Ever
received
TNF
3.5 yrs Etanercept,
Adalimumab,
Infliximab
1) RA control
2) Non RA
control
No difference in incidence or
prevalence of heart failure b/n 3 gpsd (p
=0.940)
Wolfe et al 2004
[61] National
Databank
13171 RA (5832
in TNF gp), 2568
OA
Duration: 14.2
(10.7) yrs TNF vs.
15.5 (11.4) yrs
DMARD
HAQ: 1.2 (0.7) vs.
1.0 (0.7)
Patient self report
or review of
medical records
Ever
received
TNF
agent
2 yrs Infliximab,
etanercept
Non biologic
DMARDs
Anti-TNF vs. No Anti-TNF (rates)
All heart failure: 2.8% vs. 3.9% (p
=0.03)
Incident heart failure: 0.2% vs. 0.2% (p
NS)
Setoguchi et al
2008
[62]
RA, age >=65
yrs

1002/5593
NA Hospital discharge
diagnosise
Filled
prescriptio
n duration
plus 14
daysf
TNF - 1.8
yrs;
MTX gp-
2.5 yrs
Etanercept,
Adalimumab,
Infliximab
Methotrexate HF Hospitalization in TNF vs. MTX gp:
HR (CI) 1.7 (1.07-2.69); results similar
in patients with and without previous
HF.
In patients with previous HF, HR (CI)
for death: 4.19 (1.48-11.89)

Meta-analyses

Singh 2011 [29]
60 RCTs and 46
extension studies
Any indication
other than HIV:
60630 subjects
NA NA While on
drug
(duration
of study)
RCTs:
Median 6
months
Ltes: 13
months
5 Anti-TNF
agents,
Abatacept,
Anakinra,
Rituximab,
Tocilizumab
Placebo or
Non
Biologic
DMARD
OR (CI) of CHF in biologic arm vs.
placebo 0.69 (0.18-2.69)
Burmester 2009
[5]
Long term safety
study of 36 trials
of adalimumab
(RCTs, LTEs,
open label)
6 Rheumatic
diseases
19041 patients
NA NA 1st dose of
drug to 70
days after
last dose
10 yrs Adalimumab None Events/ 100 patient yrs: 0-0.23 across
various diseases
a, b

25 incident cases of heart failure in TNF gp. 12/98 patients w/ prevalent heart failure had worsening

c

Small number of events: : 6 in TNF exposed gp, 3 in TNF unexposed

d

Small number of cases (n=7 in TNF gp)

e

Previous HF: HF diagnosis in a hospital discharge summary during the 2 yrs prior to the use of TNF agents or MTX; Hospitalization w/ HF: HF as primary discharge diagnosis

f

Filling at least 1 prescription of TNF agent or MTX -> last date of prescription+ no of days supply by prescription + 14days. Patients on TNF + MTX were categorized as TNF users.