Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Jul 17;53(8):1915–1922. doi: 10.1021/ci400216q

Table 4.

Statistical characteristics of QSAR models for CSAR datasets assessed by 5-fold external validation.

Method Descriptor Target NO AD WITH AD
R2 RMSE Spearman
ρ
R2 RMSE Spearman
ρ
Coverage
RF SiRMS CHK1
(n = 1215)
0.64 0.77 0.78 0.72 0.66 0.85 75%
SVM Dragon 0.64 0.76 0.77 0.65 0.73 0.81 72%
QSAR_CONSENSUS 0.67 0.74 0.79 0.68 0.71 0.83 87%
RF SiRMS ERK2
(n = 48)
0.71 0.62 0.80 0.69 0.56 0.79 75%
SVM Dragon 0.62 0.68 0.77 0.59 0.65 0.72 73%
QSAR_CONSENSUS 0.69 0.62 0.79 0.67 0.59 0.76 90%
RF SiRMS UK
(n = 668)
0.69 0.66 0.85 0.77 0.53 0.89 75%
SVM Dragon 0.68 0.72 0.84 0.70 0.64 0.86 71%
QSAR_CONSENSUS 0.71 0.68 0.87 0.73 0.61 0.88 88%