Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Hyperthermia. 2013 Sep;29(6):569–581. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2013.790091

Table 2.

Temperatures at which the maximum MRI signal enhancement rate occurred in Mn-LTSL samples suspended in saline

concentration temperature (°C) peak direction T-test vs Tm *
0.06mM 42.5 ± 0.3 °C positive P = 0.26
0.12mM 43.1 ± 0.5 °C positive P = 0.79
0.25mM 43.1 ± 1.1 °C positive P = 0.89
0.5mM 43.6 ± 0.6 °C positive P = 0.31
1.0mM - - -
2.0mM 43.4 ± 0.7 °C negative P = 0.48
4.0mM 44.6 ± 0.6 °C negative P = 0.08

0.06mM – 0.5mM 43.1 ± 0.3 °C positive P = 0.67
All samples 43.3± 0.3 °C not applicable P = 0.15

Initial encapsulated MnSO4 concentration: 63mM. Four replicates were performed for each concentration.

Error is given as the standard error of the mean.

Lipid composition: DPPC:MSPC:DSPE-PEG2000 (mol %) = 85.0 : 9.8 : 5.2.

*

Using a two-tailed heteroscedastic t-test, it was tested if the temperature corresponding to the peak signal enhancement rate on T1 weighted images was significantly different from the phase transition temperature of the liposome bilayer in saline measured with DSC (Tm = 42.92 ± 0.02 °C).

No peak in signal enhancement rate was observed for the 1.0mM samples.