Table 2.
concentration | temperature (°C) | peak direction | T-test vs Tm * |
---|---|---|---|
0.06mM | 42.5 ± 0.3 °C | positive | P = 0.26 |
0.12mM | 43.1 ± 0.5 °C | positive | P = 0.79 |
0.25mM | 43.1 ± 1.1 °C | positive | P = 0.89 |
0.5mM | 43.6 ± 0.6 °C | positive | P = 0.31 |
1.0mM | -† | - | - |
2.0mM | 43.4 ± 0.7 °C | negative | P = 0.48 |
4.0mM | 44.6 ± 0.6 °C | negative | P = 0.08 |
| |||
0.06mM – 0.5mM | 43.1 ± 0.3 °C | positive | P = 0.67 |
All samples | 43.3± 0.3 °C | not applicable | P = 0.15 |
Initial encapsulated MnSO4 concentration: 63mM. Four replicates were performed for each concentration.
Error is given as the standard error of the mean.
Lipid composition: DPPC:MSPC:DSPE-PEG2000 (mol %) = 85.0 : 9.8 : 5.2.
Using a two-tailed heteroscedastic t-test, it was tested if the temperature corresponding to the peak signal enhancement rate on T1 weighted images was significantly different from the phase transition temperature of the liposome bilayer in saline measured with DSC (Tm = 42.92 ± 0.02 °C).
No peak in signal enhancement rate was observed for the 1.0mM samples.