Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013 May 11;67:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.017

Table 2.

Density estimation for X1 and X2 from B=250 simulated data sets. Reliability ratios for X1 and X2 are 0.50 and 0.75, respectively. Statistics reported: (a) MSE(W)MSE(X^), where MSE(X^)=B1b=1Bn1i=1n(X^i,bXi,b)2 (coefficient of variation ≈ 0.001), and (b) ISE(GW)ISE(GX^), where ISE(GX^)=B1b=1B{GX^,b(t)GX,b(t)}2dt, for GX(t)=n1i=1nIXit, −∞ < t < ∞ (coefficient of variation ≈ 0.02). Adjusted data X^: RC, regression calibration; MR, moment reconstruction; M2 and M4, multivariate MAI with M=2 and 4, respectively; U2 and U4, univariate MAI with M=2 and 4, respectively.

(a)MSE(W)MSE(X^)
Variable ρ n RC MR M2 M4 U2 U4
X 1 0.5 1000 2.04 1.79 1.74 1.94 1.71 1.85
2000 2.04 1.79 1.74 1.89 1.71 1.82
0.7 1000 2.43 2.01 2.04 2.24 1.71 1.88
2000 2.45 2.01 2.04 2.21 1.71 1.86
X 2 0.5 1000 1.33 1.26 1.23 1.36 1.22 1.35
2000 1.33 1.27 1.23 1.36 1.22 1.35
0.7 1000 1.30 1.20 1.23 1.37 1.22 1.35
2000 1.30 1.23 1.23 1.37 1.22 1.35

(b)ISE(W)ISE(X^)
Variable ρ n RC MR M2 M4 U2 U4

X 1 0.5 1000 1.86 5.49 4.35 10.51 4.34 10.48
2000 1.88 5.85 4.66 18.25 4.65 18.13
0.7 1000 2.65 6.55 5.30 10.57 4.34 10.40
2000 2.79 7.07 5.67 16.97 4.61 16.61
X 2 0.5 1000 1.36 2.73 2.27 6.48 2.27 6.43
2000 1.44 2.93 2.42 8.48 2.43 8.36
0.7 1000 1.37 2.78 2.29 7.10 2.32 7.05
2000 1.37 2.98 2.38 8.73 2.41 8.62