Table 5.
Effect | Estimate | S.E. | z-value |
---|---|---|---|
Manner in Subject | |||
Intercept | −1.80 | 0.58 | −3.10* |
Condition: Control vs. Verb + Event Type | 2.68 | 0.51 | 5.26** |
Condition: Control vs. Event-Type Only | 0.70 | 0.51 | 1.38 |
Condition: Control vs. No-Overlap | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.91 |
Manner in Verb | |||
Intercept | 0.68 | 0.64 | 1.05 |
Condition: Control vs. Verb + Event Type | −1.85 | 0.55 | −3.34** |
Condition: Control vs. Event-Type Only | −0.06 | 0.52 | −0.12 |
Condition: Control vs. No-Overlap | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.55 |
Z-values are significant at
p<0.01 and
p<0.001.
Formula in R for both models: DepVar ~ Condition + (1 | Subject) + (1 + Condition | Event). For Manners in Post-verbal positions, the model including Condition did not provide a better fit than an empty model with no fixed effects.