Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;103(9):1568–1576. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300959

FIGURE 2—

FIGURE 2—

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid treatment on the incidence of major coronary events for (a) the primary prevention total population, (b) the primary prevention high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein subgroup, and (c) the primary and secondary prevention impaired glucose metabolism subgroups: the Japan EPA Intervention Lipid Study.

Note. IGM = impaired glucose metabolism; NG = normoglycemia. Hazard ratios were (a) 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63, 1.06; P = .132), (b) 0.47 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.98; P = .043), and (c) 0.78 (95% CI = 0.60, 0.998; P = .048) for IGM and 0.82 (95% CI = 0.66, 1.01; P = .062) for NG.

Source. Yokoyama et al.26-28