Table 2. Performances of CoCiter, FatiGO, Martini and Marmite on the disease resistant and randomly selected dataset.
| Tools | Comparison | Time | P | CI | Description |
| CoCiter | Disease resistance gene vs. Disease resistance term | 4 sec | <0.001 | 6.3576 | |
| Random genes vs. Disease resistance terms | 7 sec | 0.337 | 4.1699 | ||
| Disease resistance genes vs. random genes | 9 sec | 0.979 | 10.3859 | ||
| FatiGO | Disease resistance gene vs. Disease resistance term background | 4 min | <0.001 | defense response, immune response | Unable to accept user defined terms |
| Random genes vs. Disease resistance term background | 4 min | NA | Nothing enriched in these genes | Unable to accept user defined terms | |
| Disease resistance gene vs. randomly picked gene | 2 min | <0.001 | response to stress, defense response, immune response | ||
| Martini | Disease resistance gene vs. Disease resistance term | NA | NA | NA | too many entries to carry on |
| Random selected genes vs. Disease resistance terms | NA | NA | NA | too many entries to carry on | |
| Disease resistance genes vs. random genes | <30s | <0.001 | disease, resistance, avirulent, pathogen, plant diseases | ||
| Marmite | Disease resistance gene vs. Disease resistance term | NA | NA | NA | Unable to accept user defined terms |
| Random gene vs. Disease resistance term | NA | NA | NA | Unable to accept user defined terms | |
| Disease resistance gene vs. randomly picked gene | <30 sec | NA | NA | No entities found |
*
Strike-through fonts indicate unavailable functions.