Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 23;8(9):e74074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074074

Table 3. Performances of CoCiter, FatiGO, Martini and Marmite on the nuclear and plasma membrane protein-coding dataset.

Tools Comparison Time P CI Description
CoCiter Plasma membrane protein-coding genes vs. plasma membrane term 1 min 15 sec <0.001 12.3923
Nuclear protein coding genes vs. nucleus term 1 min 50 sec <0.001 12.9814
Plasma membrane protein coding genes vs. nuclear protein-coding genes 5 min 15 sec 0.072 14.4227
FatiGO Plasma membrane protein-coding genes vs. plasma membrane term background 18 min <0.001 membrane fraction, extrinsic to plasma membrane, lateral plasma membrane Unable to accept user defined terms
Nuclear protein-coding genes vs. nucleus term backgroundz 18 min <0.01 chromosome, ribonucleoprotein complex, pronucleus, membrane fraction, endomembrane system, extracellular space Unable to accept user defined terms
Plasma membrane protein coding genes vs. nuclear protein coding genes 13 min <0.001 extracellular matrix, extracellular region part, extracellular space, basolateral plasma membrane, lateral plasma membrane, extrinsic to plasma membrane, Golgi apparatus, organelle membrane, endomembrane system, nuclear part, chromosome
Martini Plasma membrane protein-coding genes vs. plasma membrane term NA NA NA Too many entries to carry on
Nuclear protein coding genes vs. nucleus term NA NA NA Too many entries to carry on
Plasma membrane protein coding genes vs. nuclear protein-coding genes 1 day 8 hour <0.001 transmembrane, membrane, plasma membrane, subnucleus, nucleus
Marmite Plasma membrane protein-coding genes vs. plasma membrane term NA NA NA Unable to accept user defined terms
Nuclear protein coding genes vs. nucleus term NA NA NA Unable to accept user defined terms
Plasma membrane protein coding genes vs. nuclear protein-coding genes <1 min 0.057 Cancer
*

Strike-through fonts indicate unavailable functions.