Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):41–54. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0353-y

Table 6.

Parameter Estimates for the Complete Cases Model, the Matrix Sampling Model, and the Anchor Test Model

Complete Matrix Anchor Test
L1 Solitude Effect .221 (.025) .213 (.025) .229 (.025)
L2 Hypomania Effect .029 (.004) .028 (.004) .029 (.004)
Cross-Level Interaction −.002 (.003) −.002 (.003) −.002 (.003)
L1 CFA: Happy Loading 1 (0) 1 (0) 1 (0)
L1 CFA: Enthusiastic Loading 1.285 (.031) 1.359 (.052) 1.281 (.036)
L1 CFA: Excited Loading 1.393 (.029) 1.472 (.052) 1.397 (.031)
L1 CFA: Energetic Loading 1.216 (.029) 1.297 (.049) 1.215 (.032)
L1 Latent PA Residual Variance .808 (.039) .734 (.048) .806 (.040)
L2 Random Slope Residual Variance .074 (.020) .060 (.018) .071 (.020)
L2 Random Intercept Residual Variance .373 (.036) .341 (.037) .373 (.036)

Note. The loading for Happy was fixed to 1 in each model. Numbers in parentheses are standard errors.