Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2013 Jul;13(7):1891–1897. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12284

Table 1.

Interlab variability of quantity versus fold-change measurements in the same samples

A Quantity
sample site
mean stdev cv
1 2 3 4
67 116.6 337.4 276.5 120.9 213 111 52
285 641.6 2,635.5 2,103.6 869.2 1562 961 62
50 7,812.3 34,844.6 24,100.8 11,655.7 19603 12311 63
139 12,670.9 45,624.4 32,626.6 14,999.1 26480 15565 59
886 13,819.6 42,753.6 37,017.4 17,014.2 27651 14379 52
B Fold-change
sample site
mean stdev cv
1 2 3 4
67 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
285 5.5 7.8 7.6 7.2 7.0 1.0 14.9
50 67.0 103.3 87.2 96.4 88.5 15.7 17.8
139 108.7 135.2 118.0 124.1 121.5 11.1 9.1
886 118.6 126.7 133.9 140.7 130.0 9.5 7.3

Expression of CXCL9 in 5 urine cDNA samples isolated from CTOT-01 study subjects was measured by qPCR. Samples and TaqMan assays were prepared and distributed from site 1. Master mix and real-time instrument varied by site (table S1). Four sites submitted results for this experiment and no data points were omitted. A) CXCL9 quantity determined by each site with mean, standard deviation and percent CV. B) Fold-change of each sample relative to sample 67 (QtysampleX/Qtysample67). The inter-laboratory variation (CV) for fold-change measurements was lower (7–18%) than for quantity measurements (52–63%). The same pattern was seen for the other target genes in urine and blood samples.