| Promoters: |
|
| Physician personal benefits |
-
▪
Local trials keep patients in the community
-
▪
Frequent contact with PI/researchers
-
▪
Trial participation gives prestige
-
▪
Frequent exposure to EPCT information
|
| Trial treatment benefits |
-
▪
Possibility of therapeutic benefit to patient
-
▪
Possibility that experimental treatment is better than standard treatment
-
▪
Trial provides the best and most current treatment
|
| Patient psychosocial benefits |
-
▪
Possibility of psychological benefit to patient
-
▪
Patient/family wants to try something new
-
▪
Comfortable explaining EPCTsa
-
▪
Patients are followed very closelya
|
| Logistical barriers: |
|
| Clinical trial process burden |
-
▪
Paperwork of referral process is too time-consuming
-
▪
Too much time required to explain an EPCTs
-
▪
Excessive details of protocols
-
▪
No staff support available
-
▪
Referral procedures are too complex
-
▪
Referring patients to EPCTs is extra work
|
| Coordination/Involvement with clinical trial site |
-
▪
Contacting the PI is too difficult
-
▪
Contacting the referral office at CT site is too difficult
-
▪
The institution does not keep me in the loop regarding my patients
|
| Personal Barriers: |
|
| Personal/Attitudes |
-
▪
Don’t want to increase patient’s anxiety
-
▪
Language barriers with minority patients
-
▪
Patients will blame the referral oncologist for any adverse effects
-
▪
Hassle of convincing patients to participate
-
▪
Difficulty explaining medical uncertainty
-
▪
Referring patients to trials might negatively affect relationship with patient
-
▪
Distrust of researchers conducting the trial
|
| Lack of personal benefits |
-
▪
Lack of rewards and recognition
-
▪
Loss of personal income as a result of patients seeking treatment from trial physicians
-
▪
Fear loss of control over patient care
-
▪
Lack of awareness about EPCTsa
|
| Protocol-Related Barriers |
|
| Protocol complexity |
-
▪
Misinterpretation of study protocol
-
▪
Consent procedure too difficult or complex
-
▪
Trial protocol too complex
-
▪
Misinterpretation of eligibility of patients
-
▪
Eligibility criteria too strict/stringent
|
| Trial treatment |
-
▪
Toxicity/side effects of experimental TT outweighs possible benefits
-
▪
Trial therapy not as good as standard therapy
-
▪
Low probability of therapeutic benefit to the patient
|