Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 16;5:447–457. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S46991

Table 1.

Model input data

Linezolid Vancomycin Daptomycin Data source
Clinical inputs
First-line treatment
 Success, % 89.5 89.5 89.5a Itani et al7,28
 Failure or discontinuation, %b 10.5 10.5 10.5 (Calculated from above)
Second-line treatment
 Success, % 100 100 100 Assumption
Resource inputs
Hospital stay, days 4.5 4.5 4.5 Barrett et al16
Hospital stay due to failure or discontinuation, additional daysb 5 5 5 Edelsberg et al27
Empiric antibiotic therapy, days 2 2 2 De Cock et al,21 Schurmann et al23
Definitive antibiotic therapy, days 12 12 12 Weigelt et al,10 Liu et al1
 IV therapy, days 2.5 12 12
 Oral therapy, days 9.5 0 0
Intravenous doses per day 2 2 1 Product label,2 Tice46
Oral doses per day 2 0 0 Product label2
ID physician inpatient visits 1 1 1 Tice et al,43 assumption
ID physician office visits 1 1 1 Tice et al,43 assumption
Outpatient laboratory work 1 1 1 Tice46
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic days 0 9.5 9.5 Calculated from above, also consistent with Itani et al7
PICC placement 0 1 1 Tice46
PICC complications 0 1c 1c Tice et al,31 Moureau et al30

Notes:

a

Assumed to be same as linezolid/vancomycin for the base-case analysis; no direct trial comparison with linezolid and daptomycin;

b

discontinuation due to adverse event;

c

PICC complication costs will be added to all patients undergoing PICC placement. These costs are further detailed in Table 2.

Abbreviations: ID, infectious disease; IV, intravenous; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter.