Table 2.

The values of agreement (absolute and relative agreement) between the quantitative scoring of RWM obtained by the proposed method and those assigned by the reference visual analysis averaged over the ten subsets in the validation and training subsets for the apical, mid-, and basal segments, independently

	Apical		Mid		Basal
	Training	Validation	Training	Validation	Training	Validation
Absolute agreement (%)	74 ± 1.5	72 ± 3.5	89 ± 0.8	86 ± 2.6	94 ± 0.9	92 ± 1.8
Relative agreement (%)	98 ± 0.5	96 ± 1.6	100	100	100	100