Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;26(5):971–976. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9602-y

Table 2.

Image quality ranking

0 Not used/not necessary
1 Not helpful
2 Poor
3 Good
4 Very good, but not used in the clinical assessment/report
5 Excellent, high impact on ultimate BI-RADS impression, should be used on follow-up