. 2013 Aug 17;126(10):2427–2449. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2159-9

Table 2.

Summary of stripe rust regions on group 2 chromosomes associated with stripe rust resistance QTLs

Chromosome region	Source	Markers	Field			Infection type			References
Chromosome region	Source	Markers	LOD	PEV	Freq	LOD	PEV	Freq	References
QRYr2A.1	Y16DH70	Xgwm636	14–19	37–49	2/2	9–16	31–53	2/2^b	Agenbag et al. (2012)
QRYr2A.1	Pioneer26R61	Xbarc124 Xgwm359	15–25	23–24	3/3				Hao et al. (2011)
QRYr2A.1	Recital	Xcfd36	5.0–6.8	5.5–7.7	2/4				Dedryver et al. (2009)
QRYr2A.1	Camp Remy	Xgwm356 Xgwm122, Xgpw2111	5.4–6.1	20–40	4/4				Mallard et al. (2005)
QRYr2A.1	Stephens	wPt-0003 (Xgwm359)	3.8–6.7	9–20	4/6				Vazquez et al. (2012)
QRYr2A.1	Kukri	Xbarc5	3.7–4.1	13–15	2/6				Bariana et al. (2010)
QRYr2A.1	T. monococcum	Xwmc170 (Xbarc5)	7.8–15	7–12	3/3	13–15	11–13	3/3^b	Chhuneja et al. (2008)
QRYr2A.2	Recital	Xgwm382 Xbarc122	4.4–5.4	4.5–8.1	2/4				Dedryver et al. (2009)
QRYr2A.2	Camp Remy	Xgwm359 Xgwm382	1.7	10.7	2/2	3	15	2/2^b	Boukhatem et al. (2002)
QRYr2B.1	Renan	Xgwm210a Xfbb67c	12–13	9–16	4/4				Dedryver et al. (2009)
QRYr2B.1	Stephens	wPt-5738	3–3.6	10	2/6				Vazquez et al. (2012)
QRYr2B.2	Attila	Xwmc257 Xwmc154		4.7–9.3	3/3				Rosewarne et al. (2008)
QRYr2B.2	Luke	Xwmc154 Xgwm148				5.1–7.7	32–37	3/3^b	Guo et al. (2008)
QRYr2B.2	Opata 85	Xcdo405, Xbcd152				7.4	30.7	2/2^b	Boukhatem et al. (2002)
QRYr2B.2	Chapio	wPt-0079 (wPt-8583, Xgwm410)	3.3–7.8	4.9–13.6	3/8				Yang et al. (2013)
QRYr2B.2	Luke	Xgwm148 Xbarc167				5.5–8.8	33–42	3/3^b	Guo et al. (2008)
QRYr2B.2	Kareiga	Xgwm148	55^a	30	1/1	95^a	46	1/1^b	Ramburan et al. (2004)
QRYr2B.2	Stephens	wPt-0408	2.8–4.3	8–13	5/6				Vazquez et al. (2012)
QRYr2B.3	Pingyuan 50	Xbarc13 Xbarc55	1.7–3.2	5.1–9.5	¾				Lan et al. (2010)
QRYr2B.3	Louise	Xwmc474 Xbarc230	5.5–30	11–58	7/8				Carter et al. (2009)
QRYr2B.3	Camp Remy	Xgwm47 Xgwm501	11.8	46	2/2	12	46	2/2^b	Boukhatem et al. (2002)
QRYr2B.3	Naxos	wPt-8460	4.9	12.2	1/3				Ren et al. (2012a)
QRYr2B.3	Pastor	Yr31 (Lr23, Lr13)	10–17	32–66	¾				Rosewarne et al. (2012)
QRYr2B.4	Cranbrook	Xwmc339 Yr7							Bariana et al. (2001)
QRYr2B.4	Camp Remy	Xbarc101 Xgwm120, Xwmc175	22–36	42–61	4/4				Mallard et al. (2005)
QRYr2B.4	Aquileja	Xwmc175 Xwmc332				7.8–13.9	49–62	3/3^b,c	Guo et al. (2008)
QRYr2B.4	Avocet	Xgwm619	3.6	6.3	1/3				Rosewarne et al. (2008)
QRYr2D.1	Libellula	Xcfd51 Xgwm261	5–10	8–10	2/4				Lu et al. (2009)
QRYr2D.2	Camp Remy	Xgwm102 Xgwm539	5.7–11	24–69	4/4				Mallard et al. (2005)
QRYr2D.2	Yr16DH70	Xgwm102	5.4	8.4	1/2	6.1–6.6	10	2/2^b	Agenbag et al. (2012)
QRYr2D.2	Sunco	Xgdm005 Xwmc190	15.8^a		1/1				Bariana et al. (2001)
QRYr2D.2	Guardian	Xgwm539 Xgwm349	4.4	11	½	4.3	14	½^b	Melichar et al. (2008)
QRYr2D.2	Naxos	Xgwm539 Xcfd62	5.6	10.2	1/3				Ren et al. (2012a)
QRYr2D.2	Fukuho-komugi	Xgwm349	14.5^a	9.6	1/3				Suenaga et al. (2003)
QRYr2D.3	Alcedo	Xgwm320 Xgwm301	14–18	32–36	2/2	18–28	36–53	2/2^b	Jagger et al. (2011)

Markers in parentheses were not described in the original publication but were used as closely associated substitutes on consensus maps where the original markers were not available. Frequency (Freq) describes to number of environments that the locus had a significant QTL, out of the total number of environments tested

^aLikelihood ratio reported

^bInfection type scored in field on adult plants

^cStripe number per 10 cm² leaf area