Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2008 Oct;33(5):285–292. doi: 10.1007/s10900-008-9102-z

Table 2.

Characteristics of CBOs of the Pfizer Foundation Southern HIV/AIDS Prevention Initiative

Organizational characteristic (per question posed) Participant responses (N = 39)
Yes
1. Do you have community volunteers? 89.7% (35)
2. Does your project have an established advisory committee? 59.0% (23)
3. Is your major HIV/AIDS intervention solely funded by the Pfizer Foundation? 15.4% (6)
4. Is Pfizer Foundation support supplementing an existing program? 76.9% (30)
5. Have you identified all appropriate resources needed to implement proposed activities? 61.5% (24)
6. Have you completed all planned strategies/activities for year 1? 74.4% (29)
7. Have you identified specific products that will come from your program? 76.9% (30)
8. Have you specified all outcomes anticipated? 87.2% (34)
9. Are you meeting the stated objectives listed in your logic model and reapplication? 87.2% (34)
10. Were you familiar with logic model development before this project? 51.3% (20)
11. Has the logic model development process helped you in developing measurable goals and objectives? 84.6% (33)
12. Do you have a written protocol (plan) for data collection? 51.3% (20)
13. Do you currently have data collection tools? 89.7% (35)
14. Is data stored in a computer? 66.7% (26)
Population served
Incarcerated individuals (prisons, juvenile justice detention center) 28.2% (11)
Staff (such as prisons and school) 25.6% (10)
Church/Religious organizations 23.1% (9)
Youth community organizations 41.0% (16)
Middle schools 38.5% (15)
Gay/Lesbian/Bi-Sexual/Transsexual 20.5% (8)
High schools 41.0% (16)
Adult community organizations 23.1% (9)
Peer educators 69.2% (27)
Substance Abusers 38.5% (15)
Race/Ethnicity
African American/Black 64.1% (25)
Hispanic/Latino 43.6% (17)
Caucasian/White 28.2% (11)
Haitian 5.1% (2)
Asian/Pacific Islander 2.6% (1)
All Racial/Ethnic Groups 41.0% (16)
Gender
Female 17.9% (7)
Male 2.6% (1)
Both (male and female) 79.5% (31)
Interventions/Services
Partner Counseling/Referral Services 28.2% (11)
Outreach 66.7% (26)
Health communication/public information 74.4% (29)
Group-level interventions 71.8% (28)
Counseling and testing 53.8% (21)
Individual-level interventions 53.8% (21)
Prevention case management 30.8% (12)
Other interventions (including community-level) 35.9% (14)
Community Partnerships
Churches 53.8% (21)
Community-based organizations 84.6% (33)
Colleges and universities 56.4% (22)
Local clinics, hospitals/health departments 69.2% (27)
No community partnerships exist 2.6% (1)