Table 1.
Sample | cv | tlen | sup | calls | 1 brk | 2 brk | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA12877 | 55 | 322 | 0.707 | 0.834 | 13 | 1328 | 1327 | 346 |
NA12878 | 57 | 322 | 0.694 | 0.841 | 12 | 1379 | 1337 | 329 |
NA12882 | 54 | 322 | 0.702 | 0.835 | 13 | 1310 | 1310 | 367 |
NA18506 | 44 | 310 | 0.596 | 0.864 | 6 | 1727 | 1570 | 429 |
NA18507 | 45 | 311 | 0.602 | 0.864 | 7 | 1634 | 1492 | 419 |
NA18508 | 45 | 302 | 0.590 | 0.864 | 8 | 1794 | 1656 | 511 |
SRS228129 | 41 | 329 | 0.671 | 0.865 | 6 | 1461 | 1267 | 336 |
We show coverage and mean template length for all HTS data sets (The reads were always 100 bp paired.).
All calls were made by selecting a filter with simulated precision of at least 0.97 and maximizing recall. We display relative precision [percentage of calls in (8) or (48)], simulated recall , the number of read pairs required to support each call based on our parameter selection simulation (supp), the total number of filtered calls (calls), those with at least 1 breakpoint detected and those with both breakpoints detected.