Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data. 2012 Feb 1;5(4):22. doi: 10.1145/2086737.2086742

Table VIII.

Performance comparison of five competing algorithms for the gene expression pattern images annotation (20 CV terms).

Stage Range (n, d, m) 4 ~ 6 (1023, 2000, 20) 7 ~ 8 (827, 2000, 20) 9 ~ 10 (1015, 2000, 20) 11 ~ 12 (1940, 2000, 20) 13 ~ 16 (2476, 2000, 20)
Avg. AUC MixedNorm 76.27 ± 0.53 72.03 ± 0.63 73.97 ± 1.10 82.27 ± 0.42 82.16 ± 0.16
OneNorm 75.13 ± 0.03 70.95 ± 0.14 72.49 ± 1.00 81.73 ± 0.36 81.03 ± 0.08
TraceNorm 74.69 ± 0.39 69.43 ± 0.46 71.59 ± 0.79 81.53 ± 0.16 80.88 ± 1.10
IndSVM 73.82 ± 0.78 69.74 ± 0.19 70.84 ± 0.85 80.86 ± 0.56 79.94 ± 0.19
RidgeReg 74.66 ± 1.44 70.77 ± 0.62 69.36 ± 1.44 80.40 ± 0.43 78.29 ± 0.42

Mac. F1 MixedNorm 31.90 ± 0.11 31.13 ± 0.68 32.28 ± 1.13 43.48 ± 0.39 43.44 ± 0.60
OneNorm 30.48 ± 0.12 30.07 ± 0.56 30.50 ± 1.13 41.89 ± 0.24 42.64 ± 0.47
TraceNorm 29.22 ± 0.31 30.24 ± 0.78 31.28 ± 0.54 42.07 ± 0.67 41.11 ± 0.52
IndSVM 29.47 ± 0.46 28.85 ± 0.62 30.03 ± 1.68 41.63 ± 0.58 40.80 ± 0.66
RidgeReg 28.92 ± 1.24 28.76 ± 0.95 29.94 ± 1.84 41.51 ± 0.39 40.84 ± 0.40

Mic. F1 MixedNorm 42.50 ± 0.63 57.04 ± 0.13 57.37 ± 0.71 61.97 ± 0.51 56.75 ± 0.40
OneNorm 40.80 ± 0.48 56.55 ± 0.22 56.82 ± 0.04 60.59 ± 0.32 55.87 ± 0.11
TraceNorm 41.26 ± 1.16 56.47 ± 0.27 55.37 ± 0.38 59.27 ± 0.93 54.08 ± 0.51
IndSVM 39.24 ± 0.82 55.40 ± 0.15 55.75 ± 1.70 58.33 ± 0.53 53.61 ± 0.36
RidgeReg 38.46 ± 0.41 56.08 ± 0.46 54.23 ± 0.85 59.13 ± 0.67 53.75 ± 0.31