Table VIII.
Performance comparison of five competing algorithms for the gene expression pattern images annotation (20 CV terms).
Stage Range (n, d, m) | 4 ~ 6 (1023, 2000, 20) | 7 ~ 8 (827, 2000, 20) | 9 ~ 10 (1015, 2000, 20) | 11 ~ 12 (1940, 2000, 20) | 13 ~ 16 (2476, 2000, 20) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg. AUC | MixedNorm | 76.27 ± 0.53 | 72.03 ± 0.63 | 73.97 ± 1.10 | 82.27 ± 0.42 | 82.16 ± 0.16 |
OneNorm | 75.13 ± 0.03 | 70.95 ± 0.14 | 72.49 ± 1.00 | 81.73 ± 0.36 | 81.03 ± 0.08 | |
TraceNorm | 74.69 ± 0.39 | 69.43 ± 0.46 | 71.59 ± 0.79 | 81.53 ± 0.16 | 80.88 ± 1.10 | |
IndSVM | 73.82 ± 0.78 | 69.74 ± 0.19 | 70.84 ± 0.85 | 80.86 ± 0.56 | 79.94 ± 0.19 | |
RidgeReg | 74.66 ± 1.44 | 70.77 ± 0.62 | 69.36 ± 1.44 | 80.40 ± 0.43 | 78.29 ± 0.42 | |
Mac. F1 | MixedNorm | 31.90 ± 0.11 | 31.13 ± 0.68 | 32.28 ± 1.13 | 43.48 ± 0.39 | 43.44 ± 0.60 |
OneNorm | 30.48 ± 0.12 | 30.07 ± 0.56 | 30.50 ± 1.13 | 41.89 ± 0.24 | 42.64 ± 0.47 | |
TraceNorm | 29.22 ± 0.31 | 30.24 ± 0.78 | 31.28 ± 0.54 | 42.07 ± 0.67 | 41.11 ± 0.52 | |
IndSVM | 29.47 ± 0.46 | 28.85 ± 0.62 | 30.03 ± 1.68 | 41.63 ± 0.58 | 40.80 ± 0.66 | |
RidgeReg | 28.92 ± 1.24 | 28.76 ± 0.95 | 29.94 ± 1.84 | 41.51 ± 0.39 | 40.84 ± 0.40 | |
Mic. F1 | MixedNorm | 42.50 ± 0.63 | 57.04 ± 0.13 | 57.37 ± 0.71 | 61.97 ± 0.51 | 56.75 ± 0.40 |
OneNorm | 40.80 ± 0.48 | 56.55 ± 0.22 | 56.82 ± 0.04 | 60.59 ± 0.32 | 55.87 ± 0.11 | |
TraceNorm | 41.26 ± 1.16 | 56.47 ± 0.27 | 55.37 ± 0.38 | 59.27 ± 0.93 | 54.08 ± 0.51 | |
IndSVM | 39.24 ± 0.82 | 55.40 ± 0.15 | 55.75 ± 1.70 | 58.33 ± 0.53 | 53.61 ± 0.36 | |
RidgeReg | 38.46 ± 0.41 | 56.08 ± 0.46 | 54.23 ± 0.85 | 59.13 ± 0.67 | 53.75 ± 0.31 |